Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41 44 {1987} ("Pilot LifeIts anly function to determine whether state law or regulation of the insurance industry stands or falls, pup is irtelevant this case because the only issue here is whether ERISA applies which it clearly does. The Pilot Life Analysis Hancock and amici fail to heed this Court's Pilot Life deci sion holding that where state law might arguably "regulate[] insurance and would be "saved" from under ERISA's savings clause but alsn undermine clearly expressed in tention of Congress T enacting ERISA, the state law is preempt ed 481 52. (1987} Congress clearly expressed its in tention regulate contracts other than "guaranteed benefit policies and impose ERISA'S fiduciary responsibility provi- sions upon the insurance industry therefore. ALB contrary state ...
(.png)
